Keyboard shortcuts

Press or to navigate between chapters

Press S or / to search in the book

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

Basel III Compliance

Basel III: International Regulatory Framework for Banks


Overview

Basel III is an international regulatory framework for banks developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). While primarily focused on capital adequacy, liquidity risk, and leverage ratios, Basel III also includes operational risk requirements that cover technology and cyber risk.

Bindy, as critical DNS infrastructure in a regulated banking environment, falls under Basel III operational risk management requirements.

Key Basel III Areas Applicable to Bindy:

  1. Operational Risk (Pillar 1): Technology failures, cyber attacks, service disruptions
  2. Cyber Risk Management (2018 Principles): Cybersecurity governance, threat monitoring, incident response
  3. Business Continuity (Pillar 2): Disaster recovery, high availability, resilience
  4. Operational Resilience (2021 Principles): Ability to withstand severe operational disruptions

Basel III Cyber Risk Principles

The Basel Committee published Cyber Risk Principles in 2018, which define expectations for banks’ cybersecurity programs. Bindy complies with these principles:

Principle 1: Governance

Requirement: Board and senior management should establish a comprehensive cyber risk management framework.

Bindy Implementation:

ControlImplementationEvidence
Security PolicyComprehensive security policy documentedSECURITY.md
Threat ModelSTRIDE threat analysis with 15 threatsThreat Model
Security Architecture5 security domains documentedSecurity Architecture
Incident Response7 playbooks for critical/high incidentsIncident Response
Compliance RoadmapTracking compliance implementationCompliance Roadmap

Evidence:

  • Security documentation (4,010 lines across 7 documents)
  • Compliance tracking (H-1 through H-4 complete)
  • Quarterly security reviews

Status:COMPLIANT - Comprehensive cyber risk framework documented


Principle 2: Risk Identification and Assessment

Requirement: Banks should identify and assess cyber risks as part of operational risk management.

Bindy Implementation:

Risk CategoryIdentified ThreatsImpactMitigation
SpoofingCompromised Kubernetes API, stolen ServiceAccount tokensHIGHRBAC least privilege, short-lived tokens, network policies
TamperingMalicious DNS zone changes, RNDC key compromiseCRITICALRBAC read-only, signed commits, audit logging
RepudiationUntracked DNS changes, no audit trailHIGHSigned commits, audit logs (7-year retention), WORM storage
Information DisclosureSecret leakage, DNS data exposureCRITICALKubernetes Secrets, RBAC, secret access audit trail
Denial of ServiceDNS query flood, pod resource exhaustionHIGHRate limiting (planned), pod resource limits, DDoS playbook
Elevation of PrivilegeController pod compromise, RBAC bypassCRITICALNon-root containers, read-only filesystem, minimal RBAC

Attack Surface Analysis:

Attack VectorExposureRisk LevelMitigation Status
Kubernetes APIInternal cluster networkHIGH✅ RBAC, audit logs, network policies (planned)
DNS Port 53Public internetHIGH✅ BIND9 hardening, DDoS playbook
RNDC Port 953Internal cluster networkCRITICAL✅ Secret rotation, access audit, incident playbook P4
Container ImagesPublic registriesMEDIUM✅ Trivy scanning, Chainguard zero-CVE images
CRDs (Custom Resources)Kubernetes APIMEDIUM✅ Input validation, RBAC, audit logs
Git RepositoryPublic GitHubLOW✅ Signed commits, branch protection, code review

Evidence:

Status:COMPLIANT - Comprehensive risk identification and mitigation


Principle 3: Access Controls

Requirement: Banks should implement strong access controls, including least privilege.

Bindy Implementation:

ControlImplementationEvidence
Least Privilege RBACController minimal RBAC (create/delete secrets for RNDC lifecycle, delete managed resources for cleanup)deploy/rbac/clusterrole.yaml
Secret Access MonitoringAll secret access logged and alertedSecret Access Audit Trail
Quarterly Access ReviewsSecurity team reviews access every quarterdocs/compliance/access-reviews/
2FA EnforcementGitHub requires 2FA for all contributorsGitHub organization settings
Signed CommitsCryptographic proof of code authorshipGit commit signatures

Access Control Matrix:

RoleSecretsCRDsPodsConfigMapsNodes
ControllerCreate/Delete (RNDC keys)Read/Write/Delete (managed)ReadRead/Write/DeleteRead
BIND9 PodsRead-onlyNoneNoneReadNone
DevelopersNoneRead (kubectl)Read (logs)ReadNone
OperatorsRead (kubectl)Read/Write (kubectl)Read/WriteRead/WriteRead
Security TeamRead (audit logs)ReadReadReadRead

Evidence:

  • RBAC policy: deploy/rbac/clusterrole.yaml
  • RBAC verification: ./deploy/rbac/verify-rbac.sh
  • Secret access logs: Elasticsearch query Q1 (quarterly)
  • Access review reports: docs/compliance/access-reviews/YYYY-QN.md

Status:COMPLIANT - Least privilege access, quarterly reviews, audit trail


Principle 4: Threat and Vulnerability Management

Requirement: Banks should implement a threat and vulnerability management process.

Bindy Implementation:

ActivityFrequencyToolRemediation SLA
Dependency ScanningDaily (00:00 UTC)cargo auditCRITICAL (24h), HIGH (7d)
Container Image ScanningEvery PR + DailyTrivyCRITICAL (24h), HIGH (7d)
Code Security ReviewEvery PRManual + cargo clippyBefore merge
Penetration TestingAnnualExternal firm90 days
Threat IntelligenceContinuousGitHub Security AdvisoriesAs detected

Vulnerability Remediation SLAs:

SeverityCVSS ScoreResponse TimeRemediation SLAStatus
CRITICAL9.0-10.0< 15 minutes24 hours✅ Enforced
HIGH7.0-8.9< 1 hour7 days✅ Enforced
MEDIUM4.0-6.9< 4 hours30 days✅ Enforced
LOW0.1-3.9< 24 hours90 days✅ Enforced

Evidence:

  • Vulnerability Management Policy
  • GitHub Security tab - Vulnerability scan results
  • CHANGELOG.md - Remediation history
  • Monthly vulnerability remediation reports

Status:COMPLIANT - Daily scanning, defined SLAs, automated tracking


Principle 5: Cyber Resilience and Response

Requirement: Banks should have incident response and business continuity plans for cyber incidents.

Bindy Implementation:

Incident Response Playbooks (7 Total):

PlaybookScenarioResponse TimeRecovery SLA
P1: Critical VulnerabilityCVSS 9.0-10.0 vulnerability detected< 15 minutesPatch within 24 hours
P2: Compromised ControllerController pod shows anomalous behavior< 15 minutesIsolate within 1 hour
P3: DNS Service OutageAll BIND9 pods down, queries failing< 15 minutesRestore within 4 hours
P4: RNDC Key CompromiseRNDC key leaked or unauthorized access< 15 minutesRotate keys within 1 hour
P5: Unauthorized DNS ChangesUnexpected zone modifications detected< 1 hourRevert within 4 hours
P6: DDoS AttackDNS query flood, resource exhaustion< 15 minutesMitigate within 1 hour
P7: Supply Chain CompromiseMalicious commit or compromised dependency< 15 minutesRebuild within 24 hours

Business Continuity:

CapabilityImplementationRTO (Recovery Time Objective)RPO (Recovery Point Objective)
High AvailabilityMulti-pod deployment (3+ replicas)0 (no downtime)0 (no data loss)
Zone ReplicationPrimary + Secondary DNS instances< 5 minutes< 1 minute (zone transfer)
Disaster RecoveryMulti-region deployment (planned)< 1 hour< 5 minutes
Data BackupDNS zones in Git + etcd backups< 4 hours< 1 hour

Evidence:

Status:COMPLIANT - 7 incident playbooks, business continuity plan


Principle 6: Dependency on Third Parties

Requirement: Banks should manage cyber risks associated with third-party service providers.

Bindy Third-Party Dependencies:

DependencyPurposeRisk LevelMitigation
BIND9DNS server softwareMEDIUMChainguard zero-CVE images, Trivy scanning
KubernetesOrchestration platformMEDIUMManaged Kubernetes (EKS, GKE, AKS), regular updates
Rust DependenciesBuild-time librariesLOWDaily cargo audit, crates.io verified sources
Container RegistriesImage distributionLOWGHCR (GitHub), signed images, SBOM
AWS S3Audit log storageLOWEncryption at rest/transit, WORM, IAM access controls

Third-Party Risk Management:

ControlImplementationEvidence
Dependency VettingOnly use actively maintained dependencies (commits in last 6 months)Cargo.toml review
Vulnerability ScanningDaily cargo audit, Trivy container scanningGitHub Security tab
Supply Chain SecuritySigned commits, SBOM, reproducible buildsBuild Reproducibility
Vendor AssessmentsAnnual review of critical vendors (BIND9, Kubernetes)Vendor assessment reports

Evidence:

  • Cargo.toml, Cargo.lock - Pinned dependency versions
  • SBOM (Software Bill of Materials) - Release artifacts
  • Vendor assessment reports (annual)

Status:COMPLIANT - Third-party dependencies vetted, scanned, monitored


Principle 7: Information Sharing

Requirement: Banks should participate in information sharing to enhance cyber resilience.

Bindy Information Sharing:

ActivityFrequencyAudiencePurpose
Security AdvisoriesAs neededPublic (GitHub)Coordinated disclosure of vulnerabilities
Threat IntelligenceContinuousSecurity teamSubscribe to GitHub Security Advisories, CVE feeds
Incident ReportsAfter incidentsInternal + RegulatorsPost-incident review, lessons learned
Compliance ReportingQuarterlyRisk committeeBasel III operational risk reporting

Evidence:

  • GitHub Security Advisories (if any published)
  • Quarterly risk committee reports
  • Incident post-mortems (if any occurred)

Status:COMPLIANT - Active participation in threat intelligence sharing


Basel III Operational Risk Reporting

Quarterly Operational Risk Report Template:

[Bank Letterhead]

Basel III Operational Risk Report
Q4 2025 - Bindy DNS Infrastructure

Reporting Period: October 1 - December 31, 2025
Prepared by: [Security Team Lead]
Reviewed by: [Chief Risk Officer]

1. OPERATIONAL RISK EVENTS

   1.1 Cyber Incidents:
       - 0 critical incidents
       - 0 high-severity incidents
       - 2 medium-severity incidents (P3: DNS Service Outage)
         - Root cause: Kubernetes pod OOMKilled (memory limit too low)
         - Resolution: Increased memory limit from 512Mi to 1Gi
         - RTO achieved: 15 minutes (target: 4 hours)
       - 0 data breaches

   1.2 Service Availability:
       - Uptime: 99.98% (target: 99.9%)
       - DNS query success rate: 99.99%
       - Mean time to recovery (MTTR): 15 minutes

   1.3 Vulnerability Management:
       - Vulnerabilities detected: 12 (3 HIGH, 9 MEDIUM)
       - Remediation SLA compliance: 100%
       - Average time to remediate: 3.5 days (CRITICAL/HIGH)

2. COMPLIANCE STATUS

   2.1 Basel III Cyber Risk Principles:
       - ✅ Principle 1 (Governance): Security policies documented
       - ✅ Principle 2 (Risk Assessment): Threat model updated Q4 2025
       - ✅ Principle 3 (Access Controls): Quarterly access review completed
       - ✅ Principle 4 (Vulnerability Mgmt): SLAs met (100%)
       - ✅ Principle 5 (Resilience): Tabletop exercise conducted
       - ✅ Principle 6 (Third Parties): Vendor assessments completed
       - ✅ Principle 7 (Info Sharing): Threat intelligence active

   2.2 Audit Trail:
       - Audit logs retained: 7 years (WORM storage)
       - Log integrity verification: 100% pass rate
       - Secret access reviews: Quarterly (last: 2025-12-15)

3. RISK MITIGATION ACTIONS

   3.1 Completed (Phase 2):
       - ✅ H-1: Security Policy and Threat Model
       - ✅ H-2: Audit Log Retention Policy
       - ✅ H-3: Secret Access Audit Trail
       - ✅ H-4: Build Reproducibility Verification

   3.2 Planned (Phase 3):
       - L-1: Implement NetworkPolicies (Q1 2026)
       - M-3: Implement Rate Limiting (Q1 2026)

4. REGULATORY REPORTING

   4.1 PCI-DSS: Annual audit scheduled (Q1 2026)
   4.2 SOX 404: Quarterly ITGC attestation provided
   4.3 Basel III: This report (quarterly)

Approved by:
[Chief Risk Officer Signature]
Date: 2025-12-31

Basel III Audit Evidence

For Basel III operational risk reviews, provide:

  1. Cyber Risk Framework:

    • Security policies (SECURITY.md, docs/security/*.md)
    • Threat model (STRIDE analysis)
    • Security architecture documentation
  2. Incident Response:

    • Incident response playbooks (P1-P7)
    • Incident logs (if any occurred)
    • Tabletop exercise results (semi-annual)
  3. Vulnerability Management:

    • Vulnerability scan results (GitHub Security tab)
    • Remediation tracking (GitHub issues, CHANGELOG.md)
    • Monthly remediation reports
  4. Access Controls:

    • RBAC policy and verification output
    • Quarterly access review reports
    • Secret access audit logs
  5. Audit Trail:

    • S3 bucket configuration (WORM, retention)
    • Log integrity verification results
    • Sample audit logs (redacted)
  6. Business Continuity:

    • High availability architecture
    • Disaster recovery procedures
    • RTO/RPO metrics

See Also