NIST Cybersecurity Framework
NIST CSF: Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity
Overview
The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) is a voluntary framework developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to help organizations manage and reduce cybersecurity risk. The framework is organized into five functions: Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover.
Bindy’s NIST CSF Status: ⚠️ Partial Compliance (60% complete)
- ✅ Identify: 90% complete
- ✅ Protect: 80% complete
- ⚠️ Detect: 60% complete (needs network monitoring)
- ✅ Respond: 90% complete
- ⚠️ Recover: 50% complete (needs disaster recovery testing)
NIST CSF Core Functions
1. Identify (ID)
Objective: Develop organizational understanding to manage cybersecurity risk to systems, people, assets, data, and capabilities.
| Category | Subcategory | Bindy Implementation | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| ID.AM (Asset Management) | Asset inventory | Kubernetes resources tracked in Git | ✅ Complete |
| ID.BE (Business Environment) | Dependencies documented | Third-party dependencies in SBOM | ✅ Complete |
| ID.GV (Governance) | Security policies established | SECURITY.md, threat model, incident response | ✅ Complete |
| ID.RA (Risk Assessment) | Threat modeling conducted | STRIDE analysis (15 threats, 5 scenarios) | ✅ Complete |
| ID.RM (Risk Management Strategy) | Risk mitigation roadmap | Compliance roadmap (H-1 to M-4) | ✅ Complete |
| ID.SC (Supply Chain Risk Management) | Third-party dependencies assessed | Daily cargo audit, Trivy scanning, SBOM | ✅ Complete |
Evidence:
- Threat Model - STRIDE threat analysis
- Security Architecture - Asset inventory, trust boundaries
- Compliance Roadmap - Risk mitigation tracking
Cargo.toml,Cargo.lock, SBOM - Dependency inventory
Identify Function: ✅ 90% Complete (Asset management, risk assessment done; needs supply chain deep dive)
2. Protect (PR)
Objective: Develop and implement appropriate safeguards to ensure delivery of critical services.
| Category | Subcategory | Bindy Implementation | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| PR.AC (Identity Management) | Least privilege access | RBAC (minimal delete permissions for lifecycle management), 2FA | ✅ Complete |
| PR.AC (Physical access control) | N/A (cloud-hosted) | Kubernetes cluster security | N/A |
| PR.AT (Awareness and Training) | Security training | CONTRIBUTING.md (secure coding guidelines) | ✅ Complete |
| PR.DS (Data Security) | Data at rest encryption | Kubernetes Secrets (encrypted etcd), S3 SSE | ✅ Complete |
| PR.DS (Data in transit encryption) | TLS for all API calls | Kubernetes API (TLS 1.3), S3 (TLS 1.3) | ✅ Complete |
| PR.IP (Information Protection) | Secret management | Kubernetes Secrets, secret access audit trail | ✅ Complete |
| PR.MA (Maintenance) | Vulnerability patching | Daily cargo audit, SLAs (CRITICAL 24h, HIGH 7d) | ✅ Complete |
| PR.PT (Protective Technology) | Security controls | Non-root containers, read-only filesystem, RBAC | ✅ Complete |
Evidence:
- RBAC policy:
deploy/rbac/clusterrole.yaml - Secret Access Audit Trail
- Vulnerability Management Policy
- Kubernetes Security Context:
deploy/controller/deployment.yaml(non-root, read-only FS)
Protect Function: ✅ 80% Complete (Strong access controls, data protection; needs NetworkPolicies L-1)
3. Detect (DE)
Objective: Develop and implement appropriate activities to identify the occurrence of a cybersecurity event.
| Category | Subcategory | Bindy Implementation | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| DE.AE (Anomalies and Events) | Anomaly detection | Prometheus alerts (unauthorized access, excessive access) | ✅ Complete |
| DE.CM (Security Continuous Monitoring) | Vulnerability scanning | Daily cargo audit, Trivy (containers) | ✅ Complete |
| DE.CM (Network monitoring) | Network traffic analysis | ⚠️ Planned (L-1: NetworkPolicies + monitoring) | ⚠️ Planned |
| DE.DP (Detection Processes) | Incident detection procedures | 7 incident playbooks (P1-P7) | ✅ Complete |
Implemented Detection Controls:
| Alert | Trigger | Severity | Response Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| UnauthorizedSecretAccess | Non-controller accessed secret | CRITICAL | < 1 minute |
| ExcessiveSecretAccess | > 10 secret accesses/sec | WARNING | < 5 minutes |
| FailedSecretAccessAttempts | > 1 failed access/sec | WARNING | < 5 minutes |
| CriticalVulnerability | CVSS 9.0-10.0 detected | CRITICAL | < 15 minutes |
| PodCrashLoop | Pod restarting repeatedly | HIGH | < 5 minutes |
Evidence:
- Prometheus alerting rules:
deploy/monitoring/alerts/bindy-secret-access.yaml - Secret Access Audit Trail - Alert definitions
- GitHub Actions workflows: Daily security scans
Detect Function: ⚠️ 60% Complete (Anomaly detection done; needs network monitoring L-1)
4. Respond (RE)
Objective: Develop and implement appropriate activities to take action regarding a detected cybersecurity incident.
| Category | Subcategory | Bindy Implementation | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| RE.RP (Response Planning) | Incident response plan | 7 incident playbooks (P1-P7) following NIST lifecycle | ✅ Complete |
| RE.CO (Communications) | Incident communication plan | Slack war rooms, status page, regulatory reporting | ✅ Complete |
| RE.AN (Analysis) | Incident analysis procedures | Root cause analysis, forensic preservation | ✅ Complete |
| RE.MI (Mitigation) | Incident containment procedures | Isolation, credential rotation, rollback | ✅ Complete |
| RE.IM (Improvements) | Post-incident improvements | Post-mortem template, action items tracking | ✅ Complete |
Incident Response Playbooks (NIST Lifecycle):
| Playbook | NIST Phases Covered | Response Time | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| P1: Critical Vulnerability | Preparation, Detection, Containment, Eradication, Recovery | < 15 min | P1 Playbook |
| P2: Compromised Controller | All phases | < 15 min | P2 Playbook |
| P3: DNS Service Outage | Detection, Containment, Recovery | < 15 min | P3 Playbook |
| P4: RNDC Key Compromise | All phases | < 15 min | P4 Playbook |
| P5: Unauthorized DNS Changes | All phases | < 1 hour | P5 Playbook |
| P6: DDoS Attack | Detection, Containment, Recovery | < 15 min | P6 Playbook |
| P7: Supply Chain Compromise | All phases | < 15 min | P7 Playbook |
NIST Incident Response Lifecycle:
- Preparation ✅ - Playbooks documented, tools configured, team trained
- Detection & Analysis ✅ - Prometheus alerts, audit log analysis
- Containment, Eradication & Recovery ✅ - Isolation procedures, patching, service restoration
- Post-Incident Activity ✅ - Post-mortem template, lessons learned, action items
Evidence:
- Incident Response Playbooks
- Post-incident review template (in playbooks)
- Semi-annual tabletop exercise reports
Respond Function: ✅ 90% Complete (Comprehensive playbooks; needs annual tabletop exercise)
5. Recover (RE)
Objective: Develop and implement appropriate activities to maintain plans for resilience and to restore capabilities or services impaired due to a cybersecurity incident.
| Category | Subcategory | Bindy Implementation | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| RC.RP (Recovery Planning) | Disaster recovery plan | Multi-region deployment (planned), zone backups | ⚠️ Planned |
| RC.IM (Improvements) | Recovery plan testing | ⚠️ Annual DR drill needed | ⚠️ Planned |
| RC.CO (Communications) | Recovery communication plan | Incident playbooks include recovery steps | ✅ Complete |
Current Recovery Capabilities:
| Capability | RTO (Recovery Time Objective) | RPO (Recovery Point Objective) | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pod Failure | 0 (automatic restart) | 0 (no data loss) | ✅ Complete |
| Controller Failure | < 5 minutes (new pod scheduled) | 0 (no data loss) | ✅ Complete |
| BIND9 Pod Failure | < 5 minutes (new pod scheduled) | 0 (zone data in etcd) | ✅ Complete |
| Zone Data Loss | < 1 hour (restore from Git) | < 5 minutes (last reconciliation) | ✅ Complete |
| Cluster Failure | ⚠️ < 4 hours (manual failover) | < 1 hour (last etcd backup) | ⚠️ Needs testing |
| Region Failure | ⚠️ < 24 hours (multi-region planned) | < 1 hour | ⚠️ Planned |
Planned Improvements:
- L-2: Implement multi-region deployment (RTO < 1 hour for region failure)
- Annual DR Drill: Test disaster recovery procedures (cluster failure, region failure)
Evidence:
- High availability architecture: 3+ pod replicas, multi-zone
- Zone backups: Git repository (all DNSZone CRDs)
- Incident playbooks: P3 (DNS Service Outage) includes recovery steps
Recover Function: ⚠️ 50% Complete (Pod/controller recovery done; needs multi-region and DR testing)
NIST CSF Implementation Tiers
NIST CSF defines 4 implementation tiers (Partial, Risk Informed, Repeatable, Adaptive). Bindy is at Tier 3: Repeatable.
| Tier | Description | Bindy Status |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1: Partial | Ad hoc, reactive risk management | ❌ |
| Tier 2: Risk Informed | Risk management practices approved but not policy | ❌ |
| Tier 3: Repeatable | Formally approved policies, regularly updated | ✅ Current |
| Tier 4: Adaptive | Continuous improvement based on lessons learned | ⚠️ Target |
Tier 3 Evidence:
- Formal security policies documented and published
- Incident response playbooks (repeatable processes)
- Quarterly compliance reviews
- Annual policy reviews (Next Review: 2026-03-18)
Tier 4 Roadmap:
- Implement continuous security metrics dashboard
- Quarterly threat intelligence updates to policies
- Annual penetration testing with policy updates
- Automated compliance reporting
NIST CSF Compliance Summary
| Function | Completion | Priority Gaps | Target Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Identify | 90% | Supply chain deep dive | Q1 2026 |
| Protect | 80% | NetworkPolicies (L-1) | Q1 2026 |
| Detect | 60% | Network monitoring (L-1) | Q1 2026 |
| Respond | 90% | Annual tabletop exercise | Q2 2026 |
| Recover | 50% | Multi-region deployment (L-2), DR testing | Q2 2026 |
Overall NIST CSF Maturity: ⚠️ 60% (Tier 3: Repeatable)
Target: 90% (Tier 4: Adaptive) by Q2 2026
NIST CSF Audit Evidence
For NIST CSF assessments, provide:
-
Identify Function:
- Asset inventory (Kubernetes resources in Git)
- Threat model (STRIDE analysis)
- Compliance roadmap (risk mitigation tracking)
- SBOM (dependency inventory)
-
Protect Function:
- RBAC policy and verification output
- Kubernetes Security Context (non-root, read-only FS)
- Vulnerability management policy (SLAs, remediation tracking)
- Secret access audit trail
-
Detect Function:
- Prometheus alerting rules
- Vulnerability scan results (daily
cargo audit, Trivy) - Incident detection playbooks
-
Respond Function:
- 7 incident response playbooks (P1-P7)
- Post-incident review template
- Tabletop exercise results (semi-annual)
-
Recover Function:
- High availability architecture (3+ replicas, multi-zone)
- Zone backup procedures (Git repository)
- Disaster recovery plan (in progress)
See Also
- Threat Model - NIST CSF Identify function
- Security Architecture - NIST CSF Protect function
- Incident Response - NIST CSF Respond function
- Vulnerability Management - NIST CSF Detect function
- Audit Log Retention - NIST CSF Recover function
- NIST Cybersecurity Framework - Official NIST CSF documentation